Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Membership options

Appeals court affirms IRS summons for Delaware micro-captive info

โ€“

The Delaware Department of Insurance (DDOI) has lost its latest attempt to block an Internal Revenue Service summons concerning 831(b) captives managed by Artex Risk Solutions and Tribeca Strategic Advisors, wholly owned by Artex, in the State.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on 21 April affirmed the District Courtโ€™s decision that the McCarran-Ferguson Act does not protect the documents requested and the threshold for constituting the โ€˜business of insuranceโ€™ was not met.

The IRS originally issued its summons to the DDOI on 30 October, 2017 during its investigation into Artex and Tribeca, seeking filings and communications between the Department and the captive managers.



The Department declined to cooperate with โ€˜Request 1โ€™ of the summons, citing Section 6920 of the Delaware Code โ€œwhich generally prohibits the Department from disclosing certain information about captive insurance companies to anyone, including the federal government, absent the companiesโ€™ consentโ€.

โ€˜Request 1โ€™ was seeking โ€œall electronic mail between [the Department] and Artex and/or Tribeca related to the Captive Insurance Programโ€.

The request concerned around 200 certificates of authority granted by the DDOI to micro-captives managed by Artex and Tribeca. The IRS initially believe there to be 191 certificates, but the DDOI has represented that it had actually issued 225 certificates.

In its 21 April ruling, the Court disagreed with the Departmentโ€™s argument that requested information would impact its โ€œbusiness of insuranceโ€.

โ€œFor that argument to hold water, however, we must accept that affirming the District Court would lead to a change in behavior by captive insurers (or their managers) that would reduce the reliability of captive insurers,โ€ the Court stated.

โ€œThat is a contention that cannot survive scrutiny. As an initial matter, the substantive requirements for licensure and continued permission to operate under certificates of authority issued by the Department is not altered by our affirmance of the District Courtโ€™s ruling.

โ€œThe Department has the authority to obtain documents it requires for licensure and subsequent examinations and can impose consequences on companies that 38 will not provide them.

โ€œSimply put, the Department will be no less entitled to the information it currently receives to license captive insurance companies than it has previously been. The same is true of the Departmentโ€™s entitlement to information to determine whether already-licensed captive insurance companies should be allowed to continue to operate.โ€

Captive Intelligence published on 21 April a Long Read with extensive reaction and analysis of the IRSโ€™ new proposed regulations for captives making the 831(b) tax election.