Saturday, May 9, 2026

Membership options

Home Blog

As cyber market softens, increased captive role remains 

  • Captives provide greater protection against market shifts 
  • Rate reductions may not be sustainable and could reverse 
  • Cyber frequently written as part of multi-line policies 

Despite a sustained decline in commercial cyber insurance rates, captive utilisation continues to increase, with captives playing an ever-greater role in how many organisations finance cyber risk. 

While softer pricing has traditionally reduced the incentive to retain risk within a captive, the current cyber market is not triggering a widespread retreat from captive utilisation. 

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Group captives Ascot’s largest growth potential – Mark Benz 

Group captives are generating the largest amount of interest from US-based clients, according to Mark Benz, EVP and head of alternative risk at Ascot.  

Ascot launched a captives unit in 2023, citing hard market conditions as one of the main drivers behind the launch. 

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Artex hires Aidan Kelly as SVP, advisory and property strategic risk transfer

Artex has appointed Aidan Kelly as SVP advisory, property strategic risk transfer.

Kelly will work closely with Artex producers, captive directors, and senior leadership, to evaluate, structure, and manage complex risk transfer strategies for clients.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Short: Life Time – Building a diversified captive

Joshua Reding, Life Time Inc
TJ Scherer, Spring Consulting, an Alera Group Company
Peter Johnson, Spring Consulting, an Alera Group Company

In this GCP Short, produced in partnership with Spring Consulting, an Alera Group Company, we bring you an in-depth captive case study on Life Time, Inc.

Life Time is a publicly listed chain of health clubs, which has owned a captive in Vermont since 2017.

In this episode Joshua Reding, Vice President of Risk Management, explains the captive’s original rationale for formation, how it evolves to serve a growing company and the more recent addition of medical stop loss.

Josh is also joined by TJ Scherer, Vice President at Spring, and Peter Johnson, Chief P&C Actuary at Spring, to discuss some of the important steps required in bringing internal stakeholders along, as well as the diversification benefits of a multi-line captive and the addition of medical stop loss.

For the latest news, data-driven analysis and thought leadership on the global captive market, visit ⁠Captive Intelligence⁠ and sign up to our ⁠twice-weekly newsletter⁠.

Plaintiffs appeal IRS ‘transactions of interest’ ruling on 831(b) captives

The plaintiffs in Drake Plastics Ltd. Co. v. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have filed an appeal challenging the remaining portion of the court’s April ruling on IRS micro-captive regulations.

Following the decision earlier this month by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, which struck down the IRS’s designation of certain 831(b) captives as “listed transactions,” the plaintiffs are now seeking to overturn the court’s finding that the IRS appropriately classified micro-captive arrangements as “transactions of interest”.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Conflicted, Complex, and Connected: How Multinational Insurers Navigate the World

Ashley Downey, Americas head of Multinational, Allianz Commercial

The world’s businesses have never been more globally interconnected. The insurance programs that protect them have never been more complex to design, deliver, and manage. I am struck daily by the dual reality we operate in: extraordinary opportunity on one hand and accelerating complexity on the other. Understanding both sides of that equation is essential for any professional working in this space.

A Market at an Inflection Point

In many ways, the multinational insurance market is a mirror of the global economy. Where commerce flows, so often does risk. Today, commerce is flowing in more directions, across more borders, and into more diverse regulatory environments than at any point in recent memory.

Across our key regions, we are seeing continued growth driven by businesses expanding internationally, particularly into growth markets in Latin America, Southeast Asia, and parts of Africa. These expansions represent genuine opportunities for insurers willing to invest in local expertise and partnerships. At the same time, the operating environment in established markets is growing more demanding.

For a risk manager or an insured, rapidly evolving regulatory frameworks and shifting compliance demands necessitate specialized, proactive oversight from industry experts. What makes this moment unique is that globalization and fragmentation are happening simultaneously. Businesses are expanding their geographic footprints even as geopolitical fault lines widen and deepen. That tension sits at the heart of multinational insurance today, and it requires a fundamentally different approach and skill set than the market demanded even five years ago.



Multinational Program Design in an Era of Complexity

The most pressing program design challenge we face is one that has always existed in this business but has grown considerably more acute: finding the right balance between global consistency and local customization.

Multinational clients need seamless, coordinated coverage across all their operations. A gap in one jurisdiction can undermine an entire program. At the same time, local regulations frequently require tailored solutions that do not map neatly onto a globally standardized framework. In regions where compliance requirements are shifting quickly, some friction can occur in the process of program design and execution.

Findings from this year’s Allianz Risk Barometer  underscore this challenge with 26% of the more than 3,300 risk management experts citing Changes in Legislation and Regulation as a top risk for businesses globally in 2026. Many businesses are clearly concerned about the divergence in how major economies are recalibrating alliances and digital, financial, diplomatic, scientific, trade, energy, environmental, and other frameworks.

Layering onto this challenge is the rise of borderless perils such as cyber exposures, intellectual property risks, and reputational harm. A cyberattack on a multinational’s operations in one country can cascade across jurisdictions in minutes, challenging the assumptions that underlie traditional program structures. Addressing these risks requires investment in data analytics, scenario modeling, cross-border collaboration, and a willingness to rethink frameworks that were built for a different risk landscape.

Geopolitics as an Underwriting Variable

Geopolitical developments have moved from background context to active underwriting consideration. Trade tensions, regional conflicts, sanctions, and shifting political alliances are no longer abstractions for multinational insurers. These challenges directly affect underwriting appetite, pricing, and coverage availability in affected markets.

While insurers cannot control these developments, we can control how prepared and agile we are in helping clients navigate them. That requires staying informed about political and economic developments in the regions where clients operate, not by simply monitoring headline news but understanding the downstream implications for supply chains, workforce exposure, property values, and liability environments.

Strong local partnerships are indispensable in this regard. A relationship with a trusted local insurer or broker who understands the regulatory and political climate on the ground is worth more than any amount of remote analysis. Geopolitical complexity is both a global and local territory problem, and solutions require local intelligence and understanding.

Captives and Alternative Structures: Growing Relevance

Captive insurance arrangements and alternative risk structures are playing an increasingly important role in multinational program design, and their relevance is only growing. For clients with sophisticated risk management functions, captives offer meaningful advantages: the ability to retain control over specific risks, optimize insurance spend, and align risk financing strategy directly with broader corporate objectives.

For those clients with the scale and sophistication to use captives effectively, they represent a powerful tool for customizing how risk is retained, transferred, and financed across a global program. As the cost of traditional insurance capacity continues to evolve, and clients seek greater flexibility, we expect alternative risk transfer to become a more standard component of multinational program conversations.

The Road Ahead: Where Growth Lives

Over the next two to three years, the greatest opportunities in multinational insurance will cluster around two areas: emerging markets and the digital economy.

In Latin America, in particular, increasing foreign direct investment combined with improving regulatory clarity in some jurisdictions is creating conditions for meaningful market growth. Clients expanding into these regions need partners who can provide both global program coordination and genuine local market knowledge, a differentiating combination.

The digital economy presents a different kind of opportunity. As businesses generate more revenue from intangible assets such as software, data, intellectual property, and platform services, the need for insurance products that reflect those exposures grows. Traditional property and liability frameworks were built around physical assets and physical harm. The products and structures appropriate for a digital-first business look quite different, and the insurers who invest in developing them now will be well positioned as that market matures.

Technology is also reshaping how multinational programs are administered. Faster turnaround times, greater transparency into policy status, compliance across jurisdictions, and 24/7 accessibility to program data are all reasonable expectations today. Artificial intelligence and advanced analytics can help drive efficiency and support risk modeling, though the judgment, expertise and trusted relationship with experienced professionals will remain central to complex program design.

Correcting a Persistent Misconception

One misconception about multinational insurance that deserves correction: this is not a one-size-fits-all business.

Every multinational program is unique. It reflects a specific client’s industry, geographic footprint, risk appetite, regulatory environment, and strategic objectives. The role of a multinational insurance team is not simply to issue policies in multiple countries. It is to act as a trusted advisor, helping clients understand their exposures, navigate regulatory complexity, and build programs that genuinely align with how they operate and where they are headed. That advisory relationship is the foundation of a best-in-class program, and it cannot be replicated by a standardized product.

Humans at the Core

At its core, multinational insurance is a people business. From my desk in St. Louis leading a team throughout the Americas, I can attest that delivering a coordinated program across multiple jurisdictions requires constant communication and collaboration. This includes synchronization among underwriters, risk engineers, program managers, local partners, regulators, and clients working across different time zones, languages, and cultural contexts. That is not a logistical footnote. It is the central challenge and joy of what we do.

Effective multinational insurance professionals are not simply technical experts. They are skilled communicators who understand that the way a message is delivered in one culture may land very differently in another. They are relationship builders whose currency is trust built over time. They know strong partnerships are what hold complex programs together when problems arise. And they are genuinely curious about the perspectives of colleagues and partners whose backgrounds and experiences differ from their own.

Diversity of culture, perspective, language, and professional background is not a peripheral consideration in this work. It is a strategic asset. A team that brings together professionals with deep expertise in different markets and genuine respect for cultural differences will consistently outperform a homogeneous team trying to apply a single worldview to a global problem. This is not idealism; it is a practical reality. Our clients’ businesses span the world. Our teams need to as well, in the fullest sense.

The multinational insurance market will continue to evolve — shaped by geopolitical forces, technological change, and emerging risks that do not yet have widely accepted definitions, let alone established coverage solutions. Navigating this fast-evolving market successfully will require technical excellence, regulatory expertise, and strong local partnerships.

And it will require something that no algorithm can replicate: the ability to sit across from someone from a different country, with a different language and a different perspective on risk and build the kind of trust that allows complex problems to be solved together. That human capacity, practiced with humility, curiosity, and genuine respect, is what makes multinational insurance work. It is what has always made it work. And in a world growing more complex by the day, it matters more than ever.

USQRisk hires John Levy as global head of structured reinsurance

John Levy has joined USQRisk as global head of structured reinsurance.

Levy joins USQRisk with over 30 years of (re)insurance industry experience including actuarial, underwriting, and brokering for domestic and international placements.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Is 831(b) ruling one of the US captive industry’s biggest wins? 

  • More firms likely to work with 831(b) captives but hesitancy expected 
  •  Ruling does not limit the IRS’s authority to conduct its audits on 831(b)s 
  • Likelihood IRS will appeal latest Texas court’s micro captive ruling  

Industry opinion has varied following the Drakes Plastics Ltd. Co. v Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruling earlier this month, in which the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas partly struck down IRS regulations in relation to captives making the 831(b) tax election. 

Some commentators speaking to Captive Intelligence argue that the latest ruling is one of the biggest wins for the captive industry in recent years, while others believe the ruling may not ultimately change much in practical terms. 

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Hawaii to introduce SB 2043 refining captive examinations

Hawaii is set to modernise its captive regulatory framework with the introduction of Senate Bill 2043.

Under the new legislation, captives, excluding risk retention groups (RRG), will undergo an initial examination within five years of licensure.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

UK to expand PCCs as part of captive framework

HM Treasury has confirmed that the government intends to progress legislation allowing protected cell companies (PCCs) to effect and carry out insurance contracts in the UK, as part of its wider plans to develop a domestic captive framework.

The UK Treasury announced on 15 July that the PRA had been instructed to design a “competitive and bespoke” supervisory regime for captives. 

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.