Wednesday, December 31, 2025

Membership options

Home Blog Page 68

Iowa passes bill to lower taxes on captive premiums

0

The latest captive domicile in the United States, Iowa, has passed Bill 2636, which reduces the tax burden for captives writing premiums above $40m and $60m.

Iowa’s tax on captive premiums written above $60m has been reduced to 0.02%, down from the original 5%.

Captive premiums written above $40m will be now taxed at 0.045% by the State rather than 5%.

The Bill maintains the tax rate of 0.02% on the first $20m of premium and 0.125% on the following $20m.

Iowa has dedicated captive insurance regulators, and the Insurance Division has a captive insurance bureau to carry out its obligations.

Current Iowa legislation allows companies to form pure, association, protected cell, special purpose and industrial insured captives in the jurisdiction.

Captive Intelligence published an article in June highlighting that Iowa is likely to become the next US state to embrace captives, which would make it the thirty-sixth US jurisdiction to adopt captive insurance legislation, including the District of Columbia.

Workers’ comp captive suitability continues, gateway for further lines


  • Programme structures have evolved, but remains common captive line
  • Helps captives to build reseves and investment income
  • Group captives common structure due to predictability of losses

Workers’ compensation is one of the most popular lines for captives to insure in the United States, with its predictability and stability allowing captives to build surplus and write more volatile risks.

As a result of its predictability, group captives are a popular structure to write workers’ compensation as members of the group generally feel secure in risk sharing.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

DARAG Insurance Guernsey completes acquisition of large Cayman captive

0

DARAG Insurance Guernsey has completed the signing of a sale and purchase agreement (SPA) to acquire a Cayman domiciled (re)insurance captive.

The SPA is subject to regulatory approval from the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.

DARAG intends to merge its Guernsey vehicle with the acquired captive in due course and reinsure the longer tail portion of the portfolio to its core risk carrier in Germany, DARAG Deutschland AG.

The captive was acquired from a large multinational corporate, has long tail UK employers’ liability exposure and DARAG said it is one of the larger transactions completed by the company in the captive market.

 “This transaction is further evidence of DARAG’s dominance in the captive legacy space as well as its continued interest in acquiring and managing UK EL exposure,” said Tom Booth, CEO of DARAG.

“The Group is confident, given the advanced nature of a number of other attractive opportunities in its core European market, that 2024 will deliver excellent growth.

“We look to the future with increasing confidence as demand for our legacy solutions is plentiful, investment yields and capital efficiency continue at attractive levels and competition at the small to mid-sized end of the legacy market reduces.”

In February, DARAG Group completed two undisclosed captive legacy transactions in Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, as well as one in Hawaii.

In October, DARAG concluded a novation agreement between an undisclosed Benelux based captive, the captive’s policyholder and DARAG’s German insurance carrier, DARAG Deutschland AG.

European Parliament rubber stamps Solvency II reform for captives

0

The European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly in favour of proposed amendments to the Solvency II directive that would bring some regulatory relief to captives from 2026.

Captive Intelligence reported in March that regulatory concessions for “small and non-complex undertakings”, which should include most captives, had been agreed after lobbying from FERMA and the wider captive industry.

The European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of the amendments on 23 April with 549 in favour, 56 against and nine abstentions.



The final text is expected to be published next month and the changes will come into effect from 1 January, 2026.

Charles Low, head of EU affairs at FERMA, told Captive Intelligence that while the reforms had not quite as far as hoped, they were still viewed positively by the Federation.

“It should lead to a lot of relief for quite a lot of captives, so we view this very positively,” he said.

Captive Intelligence has seen the amendments, although they have yet to be published alongside the existing rules.

FERMA had lobbied and hoped for a new “captive undertaking” to be defined under Solvency II, but the EU has not gone down this route.

It does, however, cite captives under its definition of small and non-complex undertakings: “‘Small and non-complex undertaking’ means an insurance and reinsurance undertaking, including a captive insurance undertaking and a captive reinsurance undertaking, that meets the conditions set out in Article 29a and has been classified as such in accordance with Article 29b.”

It is expected the majority of European-domiciled captives will fall into the new small and non-complex undertakings class, which would benefit from increased proportionality from supervisors.

The amendments state: “Undertakings complying with the risk-based criteria should be able to be classified as small and non-complex undertakings pursuant to a simple notification process.

“… Once classified as small and non-complex undertaking, in principle, it should automatically benefit from identified proportionality measures on reporting, disclosure, governance, revision of written policies, calculation of technical provisions, own-risk and solvency assessment, and liquidity risk management plan.”

The reforms do go on to specifically mention captive insurance and reinsurance undertakings in the context of the new “small and non-complex undertakings”.

“Captive insurance undertakings and captive reinsurance undertakings which only cover risks associated with the industrial or commercial group to which they belong, present a particular risk profile that should be taken into account when defining some requirements, in particular on own-risk and solvency assessment, disclosures and the related empowerments for the Commission to further specify the rules on such requirements,” the text outlines.

“Moreover, captive insurance undertakings and captive reinsurance undertakings should also be able to benefit from the proportionality measures when they are classified as small and non-complex undertakings.”

One of the more significant changes that would impact qualifying captives is an exemption to the requirement for audit of the annual solvency and financial condition report.

“Because of the particular risk profile and specificity of captive insurance undertakings and captive reinsurance undertakings, it is appropriate not to impose on them the audit requirement.”

Another specific example of exemptions from reporting is on climate change risks and scenarios.

“In particular, while the assessment of the materiality of exposure to climate change risks should be required from all insurance and reinsurance undertakings, long-term climate change scenario analyses should not be required for small and non-complex undertakings,” the amendments state.

It is unlikely further changes will be made to the text with vote scheduled for 23 April. If successful, the reforms will come into effect in 2026.

AM Best revises Trisura outlook to stable from negative

0

AM Best has revised the outlooks to stable from negative and affirmed the financial strength rating of A- (excellent) and the long-term issuer credit ratings of “a-” (excellent) of the operating entities of Toronto-based Trisura Group and related entities.

The ratings reflect Trisura’s overall balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, neutral business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM).

In March 2023, AM Best revised its outlook for Trisura Group to negative from stable, after the insurer had revealed a CAD 81.5m one-time write-down of reinsurance recoverables in Q4 resulting from its fronting of a US property and casualty captive programme.

In April 2023, Captive Intelligence published a Long Read highlighting that Trisura Group’s write-down and subsequent stock drop had caught the fronting, and wider commercial market’s attention, but fears of a “race to the bottom” were not expected to impact traditional pure and group captive programmes.

The revision of the outlooks to stable from negative reflects improved ERM practices, policies and procedures around Trisura’s risk management of US captive reinsurance contracts.

As a result, Trisura has renewed all its ongoing programmes successfully and reduced its overall captive exposure.

AM Best said these changes have been effective and are reflected in the company’s improving operating performance.

AM Best noted that the ratings of First Founders Assurance Company (FFAC) remain unchanged following the news that Trisura has closed on the acquisition of FFAC last month.

FFAC is licensed currently in New Jersey and New York but will expand licensing to all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

“The acquisition rounds out Trisura’s business profile as FFAC is a treasury licensed surety provider,” AM Best said.

Group captives a fast-growing trend in the US – AXA XL’s Mark Benz

0

The utilisation of group captives in the United States is expanding as companies look to share risk, according to Mark Benz, head of group captives at AXA XL.

Middle market insureds are most likely to look to be members of a group captive structure.

“They are typically coming out of the guaranteed cost environment where they’re sending premium to a carrier without the potential of getting anything back for good performance,” Benz told Captive Intelligence.

He said AXA XL is trying to take the top performers in those middle markets.

“What ends up happening is when they join the group captive, and they keep outperforming their loss projections, keep adding more loss control, they start getting some of those funds back in the form of dividends, and that really incentivises them to do better.”

Benz said group captives are a fast-growing trend in the US, and they used to be considered as an alternative market, “but now I would actually look at them as just another market”.

“It’s no longer people are trying to find them; they’re out there, and they’re probably $5bn to $7bn in premium.”

Captive Intelligence reported earlier this month that Captive Resources had now surpassed $4bn in annual premium going through the group captives it consults on.

Depending on the industries and the risks involved, some group captives are heterogeneous while others are homogenous.

“It’s spread across different industries, and it depends on the model they’re looking at,” Benz added.

If it’s a heterogeneous captive, they are usually diverse in their industry segments and geographic locations.

“If we are talking about a homogeneous captive, a lot of them are focused on construction, transportation, agriculture, and really those specific industries where it pays to bring together those insureds and bring them in one room,” he said.

Benz said the benefit of a group captive for these companies is that they can talk about their issues and what they’re seeing, in addition to focusing on loss control and risk control mitigation techniques.

“This helps the board meeting flow better in some circumstances,” he said. “The heterogeneous captive also gives insight from all the other markets, so clients do get to pick up something there too, if they are an insured in a heterogeneous captive.”

Pure captives, SPCs and group captives grow in Cayman

0

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority has published its captive figures for the first quarter of 2024, showing growth in the number of pure captives, segregated portfolio companies (SPCs) and group captives.

The number of pure captives domiciled in Cayman is now 288, an increase of two compared to year-end 2023.

There were 154 SPCs at year-end 2023, with the number rising to 157 in Q1 2024.

The number of group captives has now increased by two to 129.

Pure captives in Cayman are now writing $5.4bn in total premium, while group captives are writing $4.8bn. SPCs are responsible for $4.5bn in premium.

Assets under management (AuM) totals $20.8bn for pure captives, $13.5bn for groups and $15.2bn for SPCs.

Captive Intelligence’s data on the number of captives shows that there was a total of 41 new captive formations in the Cayman Islands in 2023, which took the total number of captives in the domicile to 567 at year-end.

Mauritian companies Fortree and Reinsurance Solutions announce partnership

0

Fortree Management Services (Fortree) and Reinsurance Solutions are partnering to bring together their connecting experience and expertise.

Reinsurance Solutions is one of the largest independent African-owned reinsurance broking groups on the continent.

The firm is headquartered in Mauritius and has offices in Africa and London from where it services reinsurance clients across the broader continent and Indian Ocean islands.

Reinsurance Solutions has in-depth knowledge of the various African reinsurance markets and locally focused skill sets in these regions.

They have expertise all conventional lines of business, such as property, engineering, political & social risks, aviation, professional / financial lines, marine, energy, and liability amongst others.

“By combining our reinsurance broking expertise and captive capabilities with Fortree’s management expertise, we can empower businesses to take greater control of their risk financing strategies and potentially achieve cost savings,” said Blessing Chiguye, executive head at Reinsurance Solutions.

“This is a mutually beneficial partnership that will greatly assist current and potential captive owners or those businesses looking to redomicile jurisdictions.”

Fortree is based in Mauritius and provides a suite of financial services to meet clients’ business needs ranging from global business companies, trusts, authorised companies, to captive insurance, family office, insurance broker, and relocation to Mauritius.

The company leverages its experience and global network to tailor solutions that will help companies with their business objectives.

Fortree and Reinsurance Solutions share a common goal to make Mauritius the preferred pure captive insurance jurisdiction in the African region, together with the support of the Mauritian regulators.

They believe they have a successful platform for potential captive owners through their services ranging from company incorporation and licensing, administration, company secretarial, directorships, accounting and tax, compliance functions, corporate governance to underwriting, brokering, reinsurance and insurance management.

“It is with great humility that we are announcing this strategic alliance,” said Kaviraj Nuckchedee, director & head of captive insurance at Fortree.

“Mauritius has all the ingredients required to position itself as a centre of excellence for pure captive insurance and this is the direction we are heading together with our strategic partner, Reinsurance Solutions.

“The latter being among the leading reinsurance broking companies in the African Region will enhance the gaming field on the captive insurance front and with that together we will provide a seamless experience to clients.”

RMC Group win gives hope for future 831(b) battles – ZMF’s Matthew Reddington

0

The jury verdict in favour of captive management company, RMC Group and its president and CEO, Raymond Anker, against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) highlights there are ways micro captives can be successful in cases that have historically gone against them.

In the RMC case, the jury concluded that the IRS failed to show that the captive manager was liable for Internal Revenue Code Section 6700 penalties.

“They came back as no on every single tax year for each of the entities, which is obviously a  big win for us and a big loss for the Department of Justice (DoJ) and for the IRS,” said Matthew Reddington, partner and head of the Tax Controversy Practice at ZMF Law, speaking on episode 102 of the Global Captive Podcast.

Reddington and ZMF Law represented Anker and RMC Group in his case against the IRS.

In the case, the IRS had argued: “Ankner and his companies designed, sold, and managed a plan to avoid federal income taxes through unlawful deductions for supposed ‘insurance premiums’ in connection with micro-captive insurance programs.”

However, the jury found that Ankner and his entitles should not be held liable for each of the tax years in question.

“They’ve [the IRS] been feeling that they are 10 feet tall and bulletproof,” Reddington said on GCP #102. “They’ve won seven cases in a row in the US Tax court, but there’s other avenues to get better results.

“Moving forward, as we push on these buttons and try to find ways that we can take this out of the Tax Court’s hands and find ways to put this in front of a jury, then those wins are not nearly as automatic.

“This should help for settlement purposes, and should help for reconsideration, or maybe not even taking the case at all on behalf of the IRS.’”

The IRS has a history of going after captives making the 831(b) tax election, winning its most recent case at the end of last month against Dr. Patel, the co-founder of an eye surgery centre and the founder of two research centres in the West Texas area.

“This should help in pushing that back,” Reddington said. “The IRS take a bully approach in a lot of tax matters where they know that they can outspend and take more time and resources than the individual taxpayers.

“With any bully you’ve got to punch them in the nose to get them to lay off.”

Reddington said more court cases should eventually emerge in favour of micro captives if the courts do their job correctly and people keep fighting their case.

“Now that the IRS has shifted some of their focus into other areas and moved more onto conservation easements, there’ll be a huge focus in different areas, which will take their resources away,” he added.

“As long as we continue to fight and push with better facts, we should see some changes in the law.”

GCP #102: Matthew Reddington RMC case, Loren Crannell on Juul Labs captive

0
Matthew Reddington, ZMF Law
Loren Crannell, Juul Labs

In episode 102 of the Global Captive Podcast, supported by the ⁠EY Global Captive Network⁠, Richard brings two very different interviews.

01.30 – 12.50: Matthew Reddington, partner and head of the tax controversy practice at ZMF, discusses the recent jury verdict in favour of RMC Group and its CEO Raymond Ankner in a court battle with the Internal Revenue Service.

13.51 – 36.04: Loren Crannell, director and head of global risk and insurance at American e-cigarette company Juul Labs, tells me why forming a captive has been such an important enabler for the business in recent years.

For the latest news, analysis and thought leadership on the global captive insurance market, visit ⁠Captive Intelligence ⁠and sign up to our ⁠twice-weekly newsletter⁠.