Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Membership options

Home Blog Page 51

European Parliament rubber stamps Solvency II reform for captives

0

The European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly in favour of proposed amendments to the Solvency II directive that would bring some regulatory relief to captives from 2026.

Captive Intelligence reported in March that regulatory concessions for “small and non-complex undertakings”, which should include most captives, had been agreed after lobbying from FERMA and the wider captive industry.

The European Parliament voted overwhelmingly in favour of the amendments on 23 April with 549 in favour, 56 against and nine abstentions.



The final text is expected to be published next month and the changes will come into effect from 1 January, 2026.

Charles Low, head of EU affairs at FERMA, told Captive Intelligence that while the reforms had not quite as far as hoped, they were still viewed positively by the Federation.

“It should lead to a lot of relief for quite a lot of captives, so we view this very positively,” he said.

Captive Intelligence has seen the amendments, although they have yet to be published alongside the existing rules.

FERMA had lobbied and hoped for a new “captive undertaking” to be defined under Solvency II, but the EU has not gone down this route.

It does, however, cite captives under its definition of small and non-complex undertakings: “‘Small and non-complex undertaking’ means an insurance and reinsurance undertaking, including a captive insurance undertaking and a captive reinsurance undertaking, that meets the conditions set out in Article 29a and has been classified as such in accordance with Article 29b.”

It is expected the majority of European-domiciled captives will fall into the new small and non-complex undertakings class, which would benefit from increased proportionality from supervisors.

The amendments state: “Undertakings complying with the risk-based criteria should be able to be classified as small and non-complex undertakings pursuant to a simple notification process.

“… Once classified as small and non-complex undertaking, in principle, it should automatically benefit from identified proportionality measures on reporting, disclosure, governance, revision of written policies, calculation of technical provisions, own-risk and solvency assessment, and liquidity risk management plan.”

The reforms do go on to specifically mention captive insurance and reinsurance undertakings in the context of the new “small and non-complex undertakings”.

“Captive insurance undertakings and captive reinsurance undertakings which only cover risks associated with the industrial or commercial group to which they belong, present a particular risk profile that should be taken into account when defining some requirements, in particular on own-risk and solvency assessment, disclosures and the related empowerments for the Commission to further specify the rules on such requirements,” the text outlines.

“Moreover, captive insurance undertakings and captive reinsurance undertakings should also be able to benefit from the proportionality measures when they are classified as small and non-complex undertakings.”

One of the more significant changes that would impact qualifying captives is an exemption to the requirement for audit of the annual solvency and financial condition report.

“Because of the particular risk profile and specificity of captive insurance undertakings and captive reinsurance undertakings, it is appropriate not to impose on them the audit requirement.”

Another specific example of exemptions from reporting is on climate change risks and scenarios.

“In particular, while the assessment of the materiality of exposure to climate change risks should be required from all insurance and reinsurance undertakings, long-term climate change scenario analyses should not be required for small and non-complex undertakings,” the amendments state.

It is unlikely further changes will be made to the text with vote scheduled for 23 April. If successful, the reforms will come into effect in 2026.

AM Best revises Trisura outlook to stable from negative

0

AM Best has revised the outlooks to stable from negative and affirmed the financial strength rating of A- (excellent) and the long-term issuer credit ratings of “a-” (excellent) of the operating entities of Toronto-based Trisura Group and related entities.

The ratings reflect Trisura’s overall balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its adequate operating performance, neutral business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management (ERM).

In March 2023, AM Best revised its outlook for Trisura Group to negative from stable, after the insurer had revealed a CAD 81.5m one-time write-down of reinsurance recoverables in Q4 resulting from its fronting of a US property and casualty captive programme.

In April 2023, Captive Intelligence published a Long Read highlighting that Trisura Group’s write-down and subsequent stock drop had caught the fronting, and wider commercial market’s attention, but fears of a “race to the bottom” were not expected to impact traditional pure and group captive programmes.

The revision of the outlooks to stable from negative reflects improved ERM practices, policies and procedures around Trisura’s risk management of US captive reinsurance contracts.

As a result, Trisura has renewed all its ongoing programmes successfully and reduced its overall captive exposure.

AM Best said these changes have been effective and are reflected in the company’s improving operating performance.

AM Best noted that the ratings of First Founders Assurance Company (FFAC) remain unchanged following the news that Trisura has closed on the acquisition of FFAC last month.

FFAC is licensed currently in New Jersey and New York but will expand licensing to all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

“The acquisition rounds out Trisura’s business profile as FFAC is a treasury licensed surety provider,” AM Best said.

Group captives a fast-growing trend in the US – AXA XL’s Mark Benz

0

The utilisation of group captives in the United States is expanding as companies look to share risk, according to Mark Benz, head of group captives at AXA XL.

Middle market insureds are most likely to look to be members of a group captive structure.

“They are typically coming out of the guaranteed cost environment where they’re sending premium to a carrier without the potential of getting anything back for good performance,” Benz told Captive Intelligence.

He said AXA XL is trying to take the top performers in those middle markets.

“What ends up happening is when they join the group captive, and they keep outperforming their loss projections, keep adding more loss control, they start getting some of those funds back in the form of dividends, and that really incentivises them to do better.”

Benz said group captives are a fast-growing trend in the US, and they used to be considered as an alternative market, “but now I would actually look at them as just another market”.

“It’s no longer people are trying to find them; they’re out there, and they’re probably $5bn to $7bn in premium.”

Captive Intelligence reported earlier this month that Captive Resources had now surpassed $4bn in annual premium going through the group captives it consults on.

Depending on the industries and the risks involved, some group captives are heterogeneous while others are homogenous.

“It’s spread across different industries, and it depends on the model they’re looking at,” Benz added.

If it’s a heterogeneous captive, they are usually diverse in their industry segments and geographic locations.

“If we are talking about a homogeneous captive, a lot of them are focused on construction, transportation, agriculture, and really those specific industries where it pays to bring together those insureds and bring them in one room,” he said.

Benz said the benefit of a group captive for these companies is that they can talk about their issues and what they’re seeing, in addition to focusing on loss control and risk control mitigation techniques.

“This helps the board meeting flow better in some circumstances,” he said. “The heterogeneous captive also gives insight from all the other markets, so clients do get to pick up something there too, if they are an insured in a heterogeneous captive.”

Pure captives, SPCs and group captives grow in Cayman

0

The Cayman Islands Monetary Authority has published its captive figures for the first quarter of 2024, showing growth in the number of pure captives, segregated portfolio companies (SPCs) and group captives.

The number of pure captives domiciled in Cayman is now 288, an increase of two compared to year-end 2023.

There were 154 SPCs at year-end 2023, with the number rising to 157 in Q1 2024.

The number of group captives has now increased by two to 129.

Pure captives in Cayman are now writing $5.4bn in total premium, while group captives are writing $4.8bn. SPCs are responsible for $4.5bn in premium.

Assets under management (AuM) totals $20.8bn for pure captives, $13.5bn for groups and $15.2bn for SPCs.

Captive Intelligence’s data on the number of captives shows that there was a total of 41 new captive formations in the Cayman Islands in 2023, which took the total number of captives in the domicile to 567 at year-end.

Mauritian companies Fortree and Reinsurance Solutions announce partnership

0

Fortree Management Services (Fortree) and Reinsurance Solutions are partnering to bring together their connecting experience and expertise.

Reinsurance Solutions is one of the largest independent African-owned reinsurance broking groups on the continent.

The firm is headquartered in Mauritius and has offices in Africa and London from where it services reinsurance clients across the broader continent and Indian Ocean islands.

Reinsurance Solutions has in-depth knowledge of the various African reinsurance markets and locally focused skill sets in these regions.

They have expertise all conventional lines of business, such as property, engineering, political & social risks, aviation, professional / financial lines, marine, energy, and liability amongst others.

“By combining our reinsurance broking expertise and captive capabilities with Fortree’s management expertise, we can empower businesses to take greater control of their risk financing strategies and potentially achieve cost savings,” said Blessing Chiguye, executive head at Reinsurance Solutions.

“This is a mutually beneficial partnership that will greatly assist current and potential captive owners or those businesses looking to redomicile jurisdictions.”

Fortree is based in Mauritius and provides a suite of financial services to meet clients’ business needs ranging from global business companies, trusts, authorised companies, to captive insurance, family office, insurance broker, and relocation to Mauritius.

The company leverages its experience and global network to tailor solutions that will help companies with their business objectives.

Fortree and Reinsurance Solutions share a common goal to make Mauritius the preferred pure captive insurance jurisdiction in the African region, together with the support of the Mauritian regulators.

They believe they have a successful platform for potential captive owners through their services ranging from company incorporation and licensing, administration, company secretarial, directorships, accounting and tax, compliance functions, corporate governance to underwriting, brokering, reinsurance and insurance management.

“It is with great humility that we are announcing this strategic alliance,” said Kaviraj Nuckchedee, director & head of captive insurance at Fortree.

“Mauritius has all the ingredients required to position itself as a centre of excellence for pure captive insurance and this is the direction we are heading together with our strategic partner, Reinsurance Solutions.

“The latter being among the leading reinsurance broking companies in the African Region will enhance the gaming field on the captive insurance front and with that together we will provide a seamless experience to clients.”

RMC Group win gives hope for future 831(b) battles – ZMF’s Matthew Reddington

0

The jury verdict in favour of captive management company, RMC Group and its president and CEO, Raymond Anker, against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) highlights there are ways micro captives can be successful in cases that have historically gone against them.

In the RMC case, the jury concluded that the IRS failed to show that the captive manager was liable for Internal Revenue Code Section 6700 penalties.

“They came back as no on every single tax year for each of the entities, which is obviously a  big win for us and a big loss for the Department of Justice (DoJ) and for the IRS,” said Matthew Reddington, partner and head of the Tax Controversy Practice at ZMF Law, speaking on episode 102 of the Global Captive Podcast.

Reddington and ZMF Law represented Anker and RMC Group in his case against the IRS.

In the case, the IRS had argued: “Ankner and his companies designed, sold, and managed a plan to avoid federal income taxes through unlawful deductions for supposed ‘insurance premiums’ in connection with micro-captive insurance programs.”

However, the jury found that Ankner and his entitles should not be held liable for each of the tax years in question.

“They’ve [the IRS] been feeling that they are 10 feet tall and bulletproof,” Reddington said on GCP #102. “They’ve won seven cases in a row in the US Tax court, but there’s other avenues to get better results.

“Moving forward, as we push on these buttons and try to find ways that we can take this out of the Tax Court’s hands and find ways to put this in front of a jury, then those wins are not nearly as automatic.

“This should help for settlement purposes, and should help for reconsideration, or maybe not even taking the case at all on behalf of the IRS.’”

The IRS has a history of going after captives making the 831(b) tax election, winning its most recent case at the end of last month against Dr. Patel, the co-founder of an eye surgery centre and the founder of two research centres in the West Texas area.

“This should help in pushing that back,” Reddington said. “The IRS take a bully approach in a lot of tax matters where they know that they can outspend and take more time and resources than the individual taxpayers.

“With any bully you’ve got to punch them in the nose to get them to lay off.”

Reddington said more court cases should eventually emerge in favour of micro captives if the courts do their job correctly and people keep fighting their case.

“Now that the IRS has shifted some of their focus into other areas and moved more onto conservation easements, there’ll be a huge focus in different areas, which will take their resources away,” he added.

“As long as we continue to fight and push with better facts, we should see some changes in the law.”

GCP #102: Matthew Reddington RMC case, Loren Crannell on Juul Labs captive

0
Matthew Reddington, ZMF Law
Loren Crannell, Juul Labs

In episode 102 of the Global Captive Podcast, supported by the ⁠EY Global Captive Network⁠, Richard brings two very different interviews.

01.30 – 12.50: Matthew Reddington, partner and head of the tax controversy practice at ZMF, discusses the recent jury verdict in favour of RMC Group and its CEO Raymond Ankner in a court battle with the Internal Revenue Service.

13.51 – 36.04: Loren Crannell, director and head of global risk and insurance at American e-cigarette company Juul Labs, tells me why forming a captive has been such an important enabler for the business in recent years.

For the latest news, analysis and thought leadership on the global captive insurance market, visit ⁠Captive Intelligence ⁠and sign up to our ⁠twice-weekly newsletter⁠.

Premium increases in agriculture open the door to captives


  • Group captives and cooperatives are a common way of diversifying risk in the sector
  • Having funds available to form a captive an issue for some in the industry
  • Crop insurance and employee benefits provide challenges unique to agriculture

The agriculture sector provides a unique opportunity for the captive industry to help organisations mitigate rising costs in the commercial market.

Group captives and cooperatives are commonly utilised in the agriculture space as industry members look to band together to diversify their portfolios amid growing challenges.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

GROWMARK members saving $20m in premium from captive utilisation

0

Members of the GROWMARK captive are saving more than $20m in premium cost since placing their property risk inside the captive.

GROWMARK is an agricultural cooperative with around 250 members, but not all of them participate in the captive.

“We provide the fuel and propane, but we also provide the seed for planting, crop nutrients, crop protection, and all the agronomy products that the farmer needs,” Jaci Mennenga, director of risk management at GROWMARK told Captive Intelligence.

“After harvest, we are the first handler and store the farmers’ grain,” she said. “Our members entrust GROWMARK to produce and deliver the products they need.”

The company has two Vermont-domiciled captives, one for property and casualty insurance, and another for health insurance.

“We started to put a lot more of our property, general liability, and auto into the captive at the most recent renewal we had on 9/1,” Mennenga said.

“Until I got here in December of 2022, we were still purchasing a lot of risk transfer. Other than for workers’ compensation, the captive was not our primary insurance vehicle.”

Mennenga said after a few years of significant premium increases and recognising the surplus position they had built up in the captive, they began to increase the captive’s leverage.

“We ended up saving a significant amount of money by comparing what we were going to get for renewal terms from the market for full risk transfer versus what we put together using our captive to take on a large amount of the exposure and then transfer the rest,” she said.

“The savings were over $20m just on the property from looking at what the incumbent carrier wanted for a $200m programme compared to what we put together.”

Mennenga said property premium decreases is not something they have heard people talk about much in the commercial market over the last year, but the captive’s participation has delivered results.

“Many of our members had a premium decrease, so that’s an incredible result,” Mennenga said.

“The captive is performing well and now our next discussions are how we can figure out how to use the surplus in the captive for risk management incentives or how we’re going to give premium holidays or dividends.

“It’s a good place to be having those types of conversations now because of the good performance.”

Pure captive the right long-term solution for Boys Town

0

Not-for-profit Boys Town continues to look for new ways to expand the use of its Tennessee captive, but will not lose sight of its general risk financing strategy.

Omaha, Nebraska-based Boys Town has supported vulnerable and homeless young people for more than 100 years, and includes its own village campus.

Speaking on episode 101 of the Global Captive Podcast David Williams, Director of Risk Management & Safety at Boys Town, explained why the organisation was forced into considering a captive five years ago.



Long-time partner Philadelphia Insurance Company had previously provided Boys Town an umbrella policy limit of $25m, but in 2019 asked if it could be reduced to $10m.

Boys Town accepted this change and were able to buy excess coverage on top, but two years later were asked to drop again to a $5m limit.

“We went out to the market and quickly found that we couldn’t get any of the excess to drop down into that five excess-of-five layer and we couldn’t get anybody to write it unless they had that primary piece,” Williams explained.

“We didn’t want to leave Philadelphia so at that point it was like: ‘Ok, here we go, let’s start a captive to cover that’.”

Williams said he had some previous experience with captives from his time at Aon, but not in feasibility studies or formations

Once they had done the research and analysis of what lines to include Williams needed to get approval from CFO, CEO, the board of trustees and the finance chair.

“It was relatively easy,” Williams said. “We have a lot of smart people at Boys Town and they get it and they realise this is a perfect opportunity for us to use a long term vehicle to take care of our risk that we can’t get insured.”

Square Mile Insurance Company, LLC was licensed as a pure captive by the State of Tennessee on 1 September 2022, with it starting by writing the property deductible.

Today the captive insures all of the wind and hail deductibles for Boys Town, the five excess-of-five umbrella policy and the workers’ compensation deductible.

In the last year Williams has also added the medical stop loss to the captive.

“We’ve really roundtable’d this with our broker to discuss some creative ideas, but we really want to be careful,” Williams said.

“We don’t want to add so many things so quickly and get so big that we lose sight of what we’re there for. And we want to make sure it’s profitable or we have enough capital in there to support a loss if we needed to.”

Tennessee requires captives to have a resident director from the State and Williams was recommended former regulator Michael Corbett by attorney Ben Whitehouse who had worked on the formation.

“Michael’s just been an awesome resource for us, as well as Ben in Tennessee, and also Josh Clark, from Gallagher, another person that was instrumental when he was with the department and getting us over to Tennessee.”