Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Membership options

Home Blog Page 52

GCP #101: The Boys Town captive, and MAC on life after regulating

0
David Williams, Boys Town
Michael Corbett, Pinnacle Financial Partners

In episode 101 of the Global Captive Podcast, supported by the ⁠EY Global Captive Network⁠, Richard is joined by David Williams, Director of Risk Management & Safety at Boys Town, to discuss the Tennessee-captive formed by the not-for-profit in 2022.

Richard also catches up with Michael Corbett, senior vice president at Pinnacle Financial Partners, and a non-executive director on the Boys Town captive.

Corbett, Tennessee’s former captive regulator, is also now president of the bank’s Apex Captive Insurance Company.

For the latest global captive news, analysis and thought leadership, visit ⁠Captive Intelligence⁠ and sign up to our ⁠twice-weekly newsletter⁠.

831(b) captives “high priority area” for IRS as it completes 2024 Dirty Dozen

0

The Internal revenue Service (IRS) has wrapped up its Dirty Dozen list for 2024 with micro captives taking the 831(b) tax election remaining a key focus area for the Service.

The IRS’ annual Dirty Dozen campaign lists 12 schemes that it believes put taxpayers, businesses and the tax professional community at risk of losing money, personal information and data.

Captive Intelligence reported in April 2023 that the IRS had proposed new regulations for ‘micro captives’, which divided opinion across America’s captive landscape.

The proposed IRS regulations would see certain 831(b) captives deemed “listed transactions,” and others labelled “transactions of interest”.

The IRS wrapped up the scheme for the year with a warning to taxpayers regarding promoters selling “bogus tax strategies” and “fraudulent offshore schemes” designed to reduce or avoid taxes altogether.

The Service said micro captive transactions continue to be a high-priority enforcement area.

“Taxpayers should be wary of anything that seeks to completely eliminate a legitimate tax responsibility,” said IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel. “Promoters continue to peddle elaborate schemes to reduce taxes and make a handsome profit.

“Taxpayers contemplating these arrangements should always seek advice from a trusted tax professional, not an aggressive promoter focused on pushing questionable transactions to make a buck.”

The IRS noted that it had prevailed in all micro captive Tax Court and appellate court cases decided on their merits since 2017.

However, last week, Captive Intelligence reported that captive management company RMC Group and its president and CEO, Raymond Ankner, had won an important case against the IRS in the United States, with the assistance of law firm, ZMF Law.

Captive Intelligence recently published a Long Read highlighting that the IRS remains at a stand-off with captives making the 831(b) tax election, and there is no indication of an imminent conclusion, with some observers believing the IRS is purposely drawing out the process.

Guernsey-on-Thames, the existing solution for London

John Rowson, Independent (Re)insurance Consultant

I have read with interest numerous articles discussing the possible Brexit Bonuses available to the UK. Principle among these bonuses is refining Solvency II regulation to better reflect the UK’s leading global (re)insurance industry.

I understand why these commentators see Solvency II as being an unnecessarily burdensome regime with regards to reinsurance, where most contracts are bespoke and each cedent and intermediary have credit committees that make a detailed assessment of the risks presented by each deal/counterparty.

Much has been said about Solvency II as a European project, which in order to work needs to take account of the regulatory environments of all 27 member states. Like many documents written by committee, this can leave the final piece of work overbearing and hence the current UK review of (re)insurance regulation.  

Bermuda is often used as a possible model for the UK to follow. Bermuda is deemed “equivalent” and follows much of Solvency II albeit with a bifurcated approach. Large commercial insurers and reinsurers must undertake much of the Solvency II compliant regulatory regime.



Whilst there is no doubt that London’s (re)insurance market would benefit from deregulation, there will always be a need for proportional regulation that is risk-based while facilitating the international flow of capital.  

It is therefore worth mentioning that much closer to London, only a 45-minute flight and in the same time zone there exists a burgeoning and innovative reinsurance market that can support London’s aspirations. Guernsey has a long history of insurance excellence, indeed the first captive was formed in Guernsey over 100 years ago in 1922 and in 2023, Guernsey surpassed Luxembourg to become the domicile with the greatest number of captives in Europe.

Guernsey has innovated far beyond the realms of captive insurance and is perhaps best known for introducing Protected Cell Company (“PCC”) legislation in 1997. This legislation has been very useful in reducing the costs of setting up ring-fenced (re)insurance arrangements for individual transactions or smaller companies.

The recent Vesttoo investigations have increased interest in the Incorporated Cell Company (“ICC”) which was introduced to the Guernsey statute books in 2006.

ICCs have always been popular with European sponsors of reinsurance companies in Guernsey, as they permit the legal segregation of the assets and liabilities in each cell, but in a more traditional form of corporate entity. The ICC structure, much like the PCC legislation that preceded it, also creates economies of scale and reduced costs.

Guernsey has always been a proponent of proportional regulation and indeed never adopted Solvency II.

Instead, it has always taken account of and respected International Association of Insurance Supervisor guidance. These guidelines have been proposed as a possible model for the UK to follow.

Accordingly, in choosing Guernsey, reinsurers might well find all of the advantages of the proposed UK regulatory changes awaiting them.  Indeed, Guernsey already regulates the capital requirements of insurance and reinsurance companies differently.  It sets the capital requirements of reinsurers at a level adjusted to take account of the sophisticated nature of reinsureds, which in effect means they hold less capital than insurers.

I would therefore suggest that Guernsey provides a knockout option for global reinsurers.  This hugely benefits the flow of international reinsurance capital in and around the London market.

Kraft Group among 15 new Vermont captives licensed in first quarter of 2024

0

Vermont has added 15 new captives to it roster during the first quarter of 2024, taking the total number of captives in the domicile to 669.

These figures present a strong start to the year for the world’s most popular domicile which licenced 38 captives in the whole of 2023.

Captive Intelligence understands the parent company of Kraft Green Mountain LLC, one of the new captives in Q1, is the Kraft Group, owners of the New England Patriots and several other sports teams and business interests.

Kraft Green Mountain is manged by AIG.

In September last year, Captive Intelligence understands the NFL formed 1920 Risk Assurance captive in Vermont, managed by Marsh.

Five of the 15 new captives in Vermont are managed by Aon, four are managed by Marsh, two are managed by NFP, two are managed by Artex, one is manged by AIG, one is managed by Advantage Insurance Management, and one is managed by Global Insurance Management & Consulting.

Captive Intelligence published a Long Read in August highlighting that Vermont is not resting on its laurels having recently taken top spot for number of active captives, with a focus on “quality over quantity” and a continued recruitment drive both within the regulator and across the local industry.

Family offices provide exciting possibilities for captive utilisation

0

More family offices are and should be exploring captive insurance solutions, with a wide variety of risk financing options available depending on the profile and structure of the organisation.

Speaking on the latest episode of the Global Captive Podcast Mikhail Raybshteyn, partner and co-leader of EY Captive Insurance Services (Americas), and Prabal Lakhanpal, senior vice president at Spring Consulting Group, discussed how captives can be valuable tools for family offices and why we may not have seen major utilisation by this group in the past.



A family office is usually structured as a privately held company that manages the wealth and investments of a wealthy family.

“At least in my opinion, family offices have been a little lagging in terms of joining the crowd when it comes to setting up captives,” Raybshteyn said.

“Some, for various reasons, may have felt a captive was not for them. Others may have thought it is too cumbersome or too complicated to set one up because they had heard horror stories or even tried to apply the law as is to their situation, to their ownership facts, and found it challenging to put together.

“And in some cases just the number of decision makers in the family office may not have allowed them to be very proactive.

“We see that’s changing in recent times, but I think there’s still a lag.”

Lakhanpal said we could be starting to see a different approach and an embrace of captives as risk managers move from the corporate space, where they might have had previous experience with captives, into a family office role.

“One of the things I am starting to see a trend on is corporate risk managers who are transitioning to family office organisations are bringing that level of sophisticated risk management to those entities,” Lakhanpal said.

“And the fact that a lot of family offices have a very long-time horizon on capital utilization allows them to be extremely innovative in the way they leverage a captive solution.”

Family offices, naturally, can vary greatly in terms of the types of assets and portfolio they manage. As such, the associated risks and insurance needs also differ from one to the next.

Similarly, ownership structures can vary where multiple generations could be covered by one family office or every couple of generations could split off to form a new entity.

“For family offices that have corporate entities or companies that manufacture something, sell something, export something, move something, the risks may be similar to a company that sells something, but is a commercial company,” Raybshteyn said.

“However, the way they’re owned and the way the family thinks about risks, the number of companies the family owns, becomes more of a private equity structure.

“While risks may be the same, especially when you look at a cross section between qualifying as regulatory insurance company and qualifying as a tax insurance company, some family offices provide very challenging equations that need to be solved.”

Lakhanpal explained that because a family office may have a very high cost of capital and very defined medium and long term objectives, it can be very exciting to produce solutions that include a captive structure.

“We’ve seen organisations where their cost of capital is well in excess of 17%, 18%,” he said.

“So when they’re thinking of setting up a captive, their objectives are very different than what a normal corporate’s objectives would be. And then we’ve seen family offices view it from the standpoint of, ‘I’m not setting this up for today, I’m setting this up because five years from now here are some of the goals I want to achieve, and I recognise I need to plant a seed today so that I have a tree five years from now to be able to  achieve all the objectives we’re trying to get to.’

“As an advisor, it’s very exciting to be able to work with someone who’s viewing programmes from such a strategic and long term perspective. I think it gives you a lot of flexibility in what you’re going to help them structure and achieve through that process.”

Listen to the full 20 minute discussion on the Global Captive Podcast here, or on any podcast app.

Domicile Wars: Sweden presents unique domicile characteristics within Solvency II


  • Mostly home to domestic, Swedish-owned single parent captives
  • Captives in Sweden can write direct, reinsure and utilise a contingency reserve
  • Swedish law does not enforce IFRS 17 reporting standards
  • Formation costs in Sweden considered expensive

The utilisation of captives in Sweden and the Nordic region more widely is expanding as more organisations are made aware of the risk financing benefits.

Although captives have existed in Sweden since the 1970s the jurisdiction does not have specific captive legislation in place, with Solvency II providing the regulatory framework.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.

Mauritius has right structures in place to be frequently chosen domicile

0

Mauritius has all the right infrastructure in place to be an increasingly popular captive jurisdiction, according to Kaviraj Nuckchedee, director and head of captive insurance at Fortree Management Services.

The popularity of captives in Mauritius continues to rise as companies look to negate rising costs in the hard commercial market, while recent changes regarding third party risk means pure captives can be used for a greater variety of business cases.

“Mauritius is well grounded in the insurance industry and has the right structures in place to be chosen as a captive jurisdiction for potential captive owners,” Nuckchedee told Captive Intelligence.

He added when it comes to effective captive insurance structuring, including its set up and ongoing management, captive experience and the right insurance partners are key factors that companies should consider.

“Fortree Management Services has both,” he said. “The firm has the island’s best-known capabilities for running pure captive insurance structures.”

He highlighted that less than 1% of all captives worldwide are domiciled in Africa. 

“This is where Mauritius now comes into play to provide the right platform and legal framework to businesses in the region as well globally, for an effective and efficient risk management,” Nuckchedee said.

“Other players on the island, be it auditors, bankers, law firms, actuaries, and reinsurance brokers, are well versed with captive insurance businesses and ready to provide the relevant assistance and support.”

Captive Intelligence recently published a long read highlighting that Mauritius is keen to enhance its reputation as a global financial hub and continue captive expansion in the domicile.

Phil Giles joins ClearPoint Health as chief growth officer

0

South Carolina-based ClearPoint Health has appointed Phil Giles as chief growth officer, starting 6 May, 2024.

The company develops and scales clinically integrated captives, including clinical providers in the sponsorship of medical stop loss captives.

In his role as chief growth officer, Giles is tasked with leading ClearPoint Health’s enterprise sales organisation.

Giles has joined ClearPoint from MSL Captive Solutions where he was managing director.

“Phil’s unparalleled expertise and strategic foresight in alternative risk and captive insurance are exactly what ClearPoint needs as we embark on this next phase of growth,” said Jeb Dunkelberger, CEO of ClearPoint Health.

“His profound alignment with our mission and vision promises to significantly propel our efforts to innovate within the alternative risk industry, ultimately benefiting a broad spectrum of employers with both standard and highly customized insurance solutions.”

In December, ClearPoint Health partnered with direct healthcare company, Nomi Health to help small and mid-sized employers across the US take better control of their health insurance costs.

In October, Dunkelberger told Captive Intelligence that there is no end in sight when it comes to current US health insurance challenges, with SMEs disproportionally being impacted.

“Joining ClearPoint Health marks a significant milestone in my career, deeply aligned with my passion for seeking out innovative and impactful opportunities within the sector,” Giles said.

“I am eagerly anticipating leading the growth initiatives at ClearPoint, contributing to the transformation of employer health insurance, and driving our collective mission forward.

“This opportunity to make a substantial difference, in alignment with ClearPoint’s forward-thinking ethos and commitment to excellence, is incredibly exciting.”

Alliant acquires Property Owners Protection Insurance Company

0

Alliant Insurance Services has acquired California-based Property Owners Protection Insurance Company (POPIC), a national captive services company focused on multifamily and single-family residential portfolios. The terms of acquisition have not been disclosed.

POPIC provides a range of services to clients that includes structuring captives, managing programmes, and administering tenant compliance.

“The POPIC team has differentiated itself in the marketplace by combining strong institutional knowledge with a highly creative and results-driven approach,” said Bill Mecklenburg, senior managing director at Alliant Underwriting Solutions (AUS).

“This will enable AUS to further diversify our services and expand our reach in residential real estate program administration.”

The POPIC team will join Alliant as part of the AUS division.

Noah Molnar, CEO of POPIC, said that joining forces with Alliant will provide his team with expanded capacity and a “deep well” of resources.

In April last year, Alliant Insurance Services launched Alliant Re, a reinsurance brokerage division, which will include offering captive reinsurance solutions.

In June, Seth Madnick, managing director of the captive group at Alliant Insurance Services, told Captive Intelligence that the company had seen exceptional growth within its captive division over the past 18 months.

GCP Short: Captive utilisation by Family Offices

0
Mikhail Raybshteyn, EY
Prabal Lakhanpal, Spring Consulting Group

This GCP Short, produced in partnership with the ⁠EY Global Captive Network⁠ and hosted Richard Cutcher, focuses on captive utilisation by Family Offices.

Mikhail Raybshteyn, partner and co-leader of EY Captive Insurance Services (Americas), and Prabal Lakhanpal, senior vice president at Spring Consulting Group, share their insight into the world of family offices, their unique insurance needs and challenges and where we could expect to see a greater utilisation of captives in this space in the future.

For more information on the EY Global Captive Network, visit their ⁠Friend of the Podcast page⁠.

For the latest news, analysis and thought leadership on the global captive insurance market, visit ⁠Captive Intelligence⁠ and sign up to our ⁠twice-weekly newsletter⁠.