Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Membership options

Home Blog Page 87

Peter Carter retains WTW captive leadership role, leads new climate practice

0

Peter Carter, global head of captive and insurance management solutions at WTW, will lead a combined climate, risk and analytics practice at the broker.

Carter, who has been leading the global captive practice since November 2019, will remain in that position while taking on the new climate role.

“Clients are looking for ever greater support in understanding what climate risk means for their organisations,” Carter said.

“WTW has significant climate expertise, which combined with the company’s core risk and analytics capabilities and risk management strengths, makes us ideally qualified to help clients navigate this growing challenge.”

WTW said climate risk “presents a significant risk and growing concern for businesses globally” and it was focused on combining its strength in data and analytics with its climate expertise to “help clients quantify, mitigate and transfer climate related risks”.

John Merkovsky, WTW’s head of risk and analytics, said: “The re-focused climate practice is another step in delivering on our “smarter way to risk” commitment through ongoing investments in superior data, technology, and talent.”

Fiji signs up for parametric policy from PCRIC

0

Fiji has signed a commitment letter for the country’s first parametric insurance product with the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Company (PCRIC).

Fiji’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Biman Prasad, and Sarah-Jane Wild, chair of the PCRIC board signed the letter in Morocco on Monday.

PCRIC is a regionally focused captive insurance company owned by Pacific Island nations through the Pacific Catastrophe Risk Insurance Foundation (PCRIF), based in the Cook Islands.

Prasad noted the product is “very timely” for Fiji as the cyclone season approaches.

“Fiji is highly vulnerable to disasters which causes extensive damages to our infrastructure, affects livelihoods and imposes substantial financial bearing on Government’s balance sheet almost every year,” he said.

He said the reality is Fiji must “fork out more money from Government’s coffers” towards responding in times of emergencies, building climate resilient infrastructure and relocation of population affected by rising sea levels and loss of arable lands.

Fiji has been trying to expand its options for cover and has taken up a concessional standby loan from JICA with disbursement contingent upon declaration of a state of disaster.

The Fiji government has also added the World Bank Catastrophic Drawdown Option (CAT DDO) to its disaster risk financing options to assist it with quick disbursement after natural disasters.

Country members of the PCRFI are Cook Islands, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Samoa, Tonga and Vanuatu.

All other member nations of the Pacific Island Forum Secretariat (PIFS) are eligible and are encouraged to become members.

Elke Vagenende to re-join Allianz as commercial MD for Benelux and Nordics

0

Allianz Commercial has appointed Elke Vagenende as commercial managing director for Benelux and Nordics.

Vagenende will re-join Allianz from her current role at AIG in the first quarter of 2024 to lead the newly established region.

She has been global head of multinational at AIG since February 2021. Prior to that Vagenende worked at WTW as head of FINEX for western Europe, and she was previously with Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) from 2012 to 2018 in various roles.

Back at Allianz Vagenende will report to Dirk Vogler, board member of AGCS SE and Allianz commercial chief regions and markets officer, in conjunction with Joos Louwerier, CEO of Allianz Benelux.

This Benelux and Nordics region will service customers across Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway.

“I am delighted to welcome Elke back to Allianz, she’s a top executive in the market with a proven track record of delivery,” Volger said.

“With her appointment, this also marks a significant milestone, the completion of our regional leadership team across our 11 regions.”

Allianz revealed back in March that it will serve the global commercial insurance segment as one business, combining the AGCS with the insurance businesses of Allianz’s operating entities.

The company will now introduce this model to its AGCS and national businesses across the Benelux and Nordics region, using the trading name of Allianz Commercial under Vagenende’s leadership.

“It is good to have Elke on board,” Louwerier said.

“With her leadership we will be able to build an even stronger and more integrated team to serve the Allianz Commercial specialty clients, large corporations- and mid-sized companies in the future in the Benelux and Nordics regions.”

Fitch revises outlook for Credit Agricole’s captives

0

Fitch Ratings has revised the outlooks for the long-term issuer default (IDR) and insurer financial strength (IFS) ratings of CAMCA Assurance (CAA) and CAMCA Reassurance (CAR) to stable from negative and affirmed the ratings at ‘A+’.

CAA and CAR (jointly CAMCA), both domiciled in Luxembourg, are ultimately owned by Credit Agricole’s 39 regional banks (caisses regionales).

CA is a cooperative banking group encompassing its 39 caisses regionales, Credit Agricole S.A. (CA S.A.), the group’s listed central body, and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank (CACIB).

The ratings agency has the same IDRs for CA, CA S.A. and CACIB. Fitch does not rate the regional banks, but CA’s IDRs would also apply to them if they were rated.

The ratings reflect Fitch’s view that CAA and CAR (jointly CAMCA) are core captive companies of CA, as CAMCA’s goals are tied to CA’s risk management.

“We believe that CA’s regional banks will provide support to their core captive insurance subsidiaries, if needed,” Fitch said.

“This is highlighted by previous capital injections by the regional banks into CAA. CAMCA’s ratings are therefore aligned with CA’s long-term IDR.”

Both companies rely on their parent for their role in insuring the group’s guaranteed housing loans, their business position, and their strategic direction.

Fitch said that profit-reallocation mechanisms and reinsurance programmes further strengthen their integration with CA.

CAA and CAR were well capitalised at the end of 2022, with CAA reporting a Solvency II ratio of 250% (end-2021: 265%), while CAR had a Solvency II ratio of 315% (306%).

CAA’s premium volume increased by 7.7% to €417m in 2022, supported by strong home loan production from CA’s network during the year. However, Fitch expects CAA’s premium volume to decline in 2023.

CAA and CAR reported strong operating profits on continued low cost of risk. CAA’s Fitch-calculated net combined ratio improved to 65.2% in 2022 (2021: 66.2%) and reported a net income of €21m in 2022 (2021: €20.2m).

CAR’s net income before allocation to the equalisation reserve was €40m in 2022 (2021: €70m).

Haskell’s pure captive move a success, adds new lines

0

Jacksonville-headquartered Haskell Company made the right decision establishing its own pure captive after 16 years participating in a group, according to Haskell CFO Bradford Slappey and Jeff Caudill, vice president of risk management.

The Haskell Company is a privately-owned engineering, construction and architectural firm, which had joined the ACIG group captive in Bermuda in 2006, insuring general liability, auto and workers’ compensation.

In early 2021, it began exploring whether establishing its own single parent captive was feasible and completed the formation last year.



Speaking on an episode of the Global Captive Podcast, Slappey and Caudill were joined by Spring Consulting’s Prabal Lakhanpal to discuss the project and its performance to date.

AEC Diamond Casualty, Inc was licensed in Vermont in May 2022, with Spring Consulting Group working closely with Haskell on the feasibility and formation of the new captive.

ACIG was formed in 1981 for three construction companies and also formed the United States’ first risk retention group (RRG), American Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group (“ACICRRG”), in 1986.

Today, ACIG is rated ‘A’ (Excellent) by AM Best, has around 40 members and in December 2021 reported it had $236,254,000 of shareholder equity. It was inducted into the Bermuda Captive Hall of Fame in September 2022.

“It was really a safety related move,” said Slappey, discussing the original decision to join ACIG.

“We wanted to get better at safety and their group was 40 general contractors focused on safety and I think we achieved that goal and got much better at safety over the years.”

As the Haskell Company continued to grow, however, its insurance and risk financing needs became more complex, with Slappey explaining it became obvious the company’s profile did not fit as well as it had done previously.

“I thought we were at a point in time and we had enough scale that we could start our own,” he added.

Caudill joined Haskell in October 2020 and was approached by Slappey shortly after to assess the viability of forming their own captive.

“That’s when I reached out to the Spring Group and engaged them in a feasibility study. We took our time, we didn’t really go through it in a big hurry,” Caudill said.

“We could have probably done the process in four to six months, but we stretched it out to really almost a year to match up with our current renewal structure. Timing made a whole lot of sense.”

Lakhanpal, senior vice president at Spring, said a detailed review and extensive due diligence of the risk profile and group arrangement was required to assess whether establishing a new, single parent captive was the optimum solution for Haskell.

“As we went through the process, our intention was to look at it both from a qualitative perspective, which is to say, policy language, ensuring there’s going to be no gaps in coverage,” Lakhanpal said on the podcast.

“If there were gaps in coverage, we wanted to lay those out clearly, as well as articulate how those gaps could be covered within a single parent captive model.

“Then from a quantitative perspective, certainly there was an evaluation of costs, a comprehensive review of what it’s going to take to structure a programme like this, what sort of capitalisation will be needed, what collateral will be needed.

“Given their long relationship with the group captive, it was important to acknowledge all the existing surplus that sat within the programme, lay out the cashflow implications of moving away from the group captive towards a single parent captive and how all of that would play out over the next few years.”

AEC Diamond Casualty has begun by writing auto, workers’ compensation and general liability, replicating the lines it previously placed with the group captive, but Haskell has also moved its medical stop loss straight into the captive.

Caudill said professional liability is a coverage they are looking to add to the captive as the capital base builds, and the first year of operation was a success.

“We’ve had a successful first year,” he added. “We have had great experience in those lines for many years. It was not unexpected that we would have a very good result at the end.

“From a cash flow standpoint, we’re able to reduce our fees, we reduced our insurance premiums overall, changed the structure of our programme.

“We’ve been able to move our medical stop loss in there right away and we’re not done. We’re looking to do some more in the future.”

ClearPoint launches MSL captive for small to mid-sized employers

0

A medical stop-loss captive and employer services platform has been launched by South Carolina-based ClearPoint Health to provide insurance to benefit advisors and small to mid-sized employers.

ClearPoint’s captive platform is designed for employers ranging from 10 to 1,000 employees as well as to partner directly with benefit advisors.

The captive was founded by a group of clinicians, underwriters, technologists, and risk management experts, led by co-founder and CEO, Jeb Dunkelberger.

“Phenomenal things happen when you bring brilliantly passionate people together and agree on a core mission to serve employers rather than sell them,” said Dunkelberger.

“We’re excited to announce a number of new partnerships as we approach the 2024 plan year.”

Those using the ClearPoint Health Platform can pick their preferred service partners, including third party administrators, pharmacy benefit managers, networks clinical cost management and clinical quality improvement enhancers.

The company said that by grouping employers with 10 to 1,000 employees into a shared vehicle, they are able to stabilise the cost of all necessary components for self-funding, while generating a better experience and cost for its members.

AM Best affirms ratings for BP’s Guernsey and Vermont captives

0

AM Best has affirmed the financial strength ratings of ‘A-’ (excellent) and the long-term issuer credit ratings of “a-” (excellent) of Guernsey-domiciled Jupiter Insurance Limited, and Vermont-domiciled Saturn Insurance Inc.

Saturn and Jupiter are pure captives owned by energy giant BP Plc with Jupiter being the company’s principal captive providing “substantial” reinsurance to Saturn.

Jupiter does not purchase any outward reinsurance cover, supporting BP’s current strategy to retain risks when possible.

The company’s principal captive’s risks consist mainly of onshore and offshore property damage and business interruption.

Saturn’s risks include terrorism, accessing the United States’ federal backstop under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), property damage and business interruption, workers’ compensation, environmental protection, and certificate of financial responsibility cover.

The ratings reflect Jupiter’s balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, and Saturn’s balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as strong.

Jupiter and Saturn’s balance sheet strength is underpinned by their strongest level of risk-adjusted capitalisation, as measured by AM Best’s capital adequacy ratio (BCAR).

A partially offsetting factor for Jupiter includes its concentrated investment portfolio, as well as its high underwriting limits provided to several facilities, which could result in volatility in the captive’s solvency position in the event of very large losses.

Saturn’s partially offsetting rating factors include the captive’s concentrated investment portfolio and dependence on reinsurance to protect its balance sheet strength against high-severity, low-frequency losses.

The ratings also reflect Saturn’s small capital base, which exposes its risk-adjusted capitalisation to potential volatility.

Jupiter has reported strong operating results over the past five years, demonstrated by a weighted average return-on-equity ratio of 8.1%, while Saturn has a track record of solid underwriting profitability, as demonstrated by a five-year (2018-2022) weighted average combined ratio of 40.9%.

Jupiter’s operating performance is subject to volatility from exposure to high-severity, low-frequency losses in conjunction with the large line sizes offered, relative to the captive’s premium.

This was evident in 2022, when a fire in one of BP’s refineries in Toledo drove the combined ratio up to 108.9%, compared with a five-year weighted average combined ratio of 20.2%.

Declining insured values due to BP’s divestments, lower oil prices and soft market conditions have put downward pressure on Jupiter and Saturn’s premium income in recent years, except in 2022 when some of these trends reversed.

GCP Short: From group member to pure captive owner

0
Prabal Lakhanpal, Spring Consulting Group
Bradford Slappey, Haskell Company
Jeff Caudill, Haskell Company

In this GCP Short, produced in partnership with Spring Consulting Group, Richard shares the cast study of the Haskell Company deciding to move out of a group captive structure to form its own single parent captive in Vermont.

Haskell Company’s CFO Bradford Slappey and Jeff Caudill, Vice President of Risk Management, discuss the profile of the company, the lines originally insured through the group captive and why they came to the decision to establish a pure captive.

Prabal Lakhanpal, senior vice president at Spring, explains the process involved and why Haskell and why its risk profile made a good candidate.

For more information on Spring Consulting Group, visit its Friend of the Podcast page on Captive Intelligence here.

Stay up to date with all major developments in the captive market by signing up to the twice-weekly Captive Intelligence Newsletter.

AM best affirms rating of Lufthansa’s Delvag captive

0

AM Best has affirmed the financial strength rating of ‘A-’ (excellent) and the long-term issuer credit rating of ‘a-’ (excellent) of Lufthansa’s German-domiciled Delvag Versicherungs-AG. The outlook of the ratings is stable.

Delvag uses its expertise in the aviation and transport sectors to write a book of third-party business alongside its core first party insurance for the Lufthansa portfolio.

In August, it was revealed Lufthansa was considering the sale of its near 100-year-old captive Delvag and its in-house broker Albatros, according to reports from Bloomberg.

In October 2021, Delvag’s Tobias Winkler and Andreas Brügel spoke on GCP #58 about the history and evolution of the one of the oldest captive insurer’s in the world.

The balance sheet strength of the captive is underpinned by its risk-adjusted capitalisation, as measured by Best’s capital adequacy ratio (BCAR), which remained at the strongest level at year-end 2022.

AM Best expects the captive’s prospective risk-adjusted capitalisation to be maintained at the strongest level, further supported by a profit and loss absorption agreement with Lufthansa, which provides Delvag with balance sheet protection.

The balance sheet strength assessment also factors in Delvag’s “conservative and prudent” reserving practices, as well as its good liquidity profile.

A partly offsetting rating factor is Delvag’s moderately high dependence on reinsurance to protect its aviation fleet business.

However, the associated credit risk is mitigated by a financially strong and diverse reinsurance panel.

Delvag has a good historical earnings track record, demonstrated by a five-year weighted average operating ratio of 65% (2018-2022), supported by a good balance of underwriting and investment income.

The captive recorded a strong technical performance in 2022 tied to a low claims experience, with a 72% combined ratio, below the five-years weighted average combined ratio of 83% (2018-2022).

The company has undertaken remedial actions since 2020 on underperforming lines of business and partial discontinuation of non-group-related reinsurance business

Recycling, releasing capital for new lines key benefit of legacy engagement


  • Wide array of options available to captives interested in legacy transactions
  • Mature captive domiciles common target of legacy specialists
  • Offloading legacy liabilities can be a valuable tool for captive owners
  • Education and awareness of legacy solutions holding back further adoption

The legacy market is a proving a popular solution for captive owners looking for a full captive sale, and for those wanting rid of specific risks or certain underwriting years.

There are challenges that can occur when a company decides to utilise a legacy transaction, such as bifurcating collateral in instances when a captive only wants to remove certain policy years.

Subscribe to Ci Premium to continue reading
Captive Intelligence provides high-value information, industry analysis, exclusive interviews and business intelligence tools to professionals in the captive insurance market.